The political climate in the United States around climate change has always been complicated. Since the 80s and 90s when climate change became an issue of cultural significance, with momentum building towards rapid progress under the Obama presidency. Unfortunately, with recent moves by the Trump administration, much of this progress is in jeopardy. Donald Trump’s recent move to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Accords is a wrong headed and dangerous move, calculated to placate his blue-collar and big-oil backers. While largely symbolic, withdrawal from the Paris Accords will have very real implications for US businesses and the environment.

The Paris Accords, a UN treaty organization which allows signatories to set their own goals and benchmarks in reducing emissions, has succeeded for the most part in what it was created to do: get the global community as a whole to the table to discuss climate change. While it offers no specific mechanisms to enforce compliance, and does not create objective standards to measure progress, it has sparked massive awareness about climate change. Because of the Paris Accords, dozens of developing countries have begun their own climate action initiatives. China, for instance, recently announced that it would spend $360 billion by 2020 on renewable energy, with the goal of completely eliminating coal power plants (1). India set similar goals, committing to use less fossil fuels and invest in the efficiency of their power grid, with many other developing countries across Asia and Africa following suite. Here in the United States, the federal government set higher auto-efficiency standards and demanded less carbon emissions from fossil fuel power plants (2), all sparked by the Paris Accords. Clearly, the Paris Accords have been a valuable tool to gather global support around action on climate change, and a complete US withdrawal from the treaty is a major setback.

The environmental implications of
US withdrawal are not necessarily clear. President  Trump set a timetable of close to 3 years for
withdrawal from the Accords, leaving many unknowns about how rapidly US
regulations will be restructured. We do know, however, that US emissions are
unlikely to decrease, with most experts projecting that emissions will remain
flat over the next decade (3). It is also fair to assume that less federal
support will be given to clean energy, which could jeopardize the profitability
of many green-tech companies. In addition, the UN Green Climate Fund, which
funds green-energy projects in developing countries, will likely receive no
financial support from the US government (4). In sum, withdrawing from the
Accords means no central coordination against climate change and little to no
funding of international research or green infrastructure.

The business implications of this
are more easily measurable. Green energy is the fastest growing industry in the
US, estimated to be worth over $200 billion in revenue a year. Trump’s
withdrawal from the Accords signals that the federal government will also
reduce subsidies for clean-technology, which has helped fuel it’s rapid growth.
Losing growth in this industry would mean thousands of jobs lost, and potential
billions lost in stock investments. Most large corporations directly benefit
from cutting edge cleantech; cheap and efficient solar panels, power storage,
and building efficiency having helped to drastically reduce their operations
costs over the past decade. In addition, many businesses fear that societal
blowback will negatively impact their businesses. Leaving the Paris Accords was
an extremely unpopular move, with over 65% of Americans estimated to be in
opposition (5). Businesses realize that the United States needs to be at the
bargaining table on climate change, because it is such a huge issue to American
voters and consumers.

The decision to leave the Paris
Accord faced immediate and sharp backlash, with the most vociferous being from
the business community. In early May, the CEOs of 30 Fortune-500 US
corporations wrote a letter to Trump, urging him to stay in the Paris
Agreement. The Corporations included Coca-Cola, 3M, PG&E, and Disney (6).
Only a few short days after the announcement, over 360 companies and several
hundred local state municipalities signed an open letter pledging to take
independent action on climate change regardless of the federal government’s
policies (7). Business magnate Michael Bloomberg organized the letter, and
personally pledged  to give $15 million
to the UN Green Energy Fund to help offset funds it would lose because of US
withdrawal (8). These businesses, in their own words, seek to set an example
and demonstrate that “the
actors that will provide the leadership necessary to meet our Paris commitment
are found in city halls, state capitols, colleges and universities, investors
and businesses”(9).

The way forward, then, is clear.
Businesses and individuals must act independently.

It is widely understood that climate change cannot be ignored. Without the support of the US federal government, making progress here at home will be difficult. However, as businesses and individuals across the United States are showing, independent action can make an impact. Green-energy companies and products like Tesla must be supported with the vote of our dollars. Climate research must be independently funded; charities that give to climate research need donations. The oil-interests and businesses that bought influence in the White House must be boycotted and petitioned, the politicians who supported this decision must be voted out of office. Above all, as a society, we must raise our voice and riot; rage against the cabal of business interests that do not care about our environment. 

Sources

(1)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/05/world/asia/china-renewable-energy-investment.html

(2) http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/column-economics-politics-trumps-paris-withdrawal/

(3) https://qz.com/995109/trump-is-reportedly-pulling-the-us-out-of-the-paris-climate-accord-what-happens-next/

(4) http://www.npr.org/2017/06/01/531056661/5-things-that-could-change-when-the-u-s-leaves-the-paris-climate-deal

(5) http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/06/daily-chart-1

(6) https://hbr.org/2017/05/u-s-business-leaders-want-to-stay-in-the-paris-climate-accord

(7) http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/17/502425711/hundreds-of-u-s-businesses-urge-trump-to-uphold-paris-climate-deal

(8) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/former-new-york-city-mayor-michael-bloomberg-has-said-he-will-personally-make-up-the-15m-in-funding-a7769416.html

(9) http://wearestillin.com/