INTRODUCTION

WikiLeaks is an international non-profit organization that publishes leaks and secrets from different sources. The history of the organization tells that over past eleven years it has leaked or published about 10 million secret government documents through its website. CIA is the Central Intelligence agency and is US based one. It is the only civilian intelligence on which the US government can rely and get work done on presidential orders.

Recently, on March 7^th 2017, the WikiLeaks website published the documents that contained the information about the methods and techniques used by the Central Intelligence Agency to break into TVs, phones and cars. It also contained details about how possibly the soft wares of the global giants of tech like Apple, Google and Samsung can be breached (Holland, 2017).

Whether WikiLeaks
is legal or not has ever remained a hot questions and a controversial debate.
To prove the WikiLeaks a legal organization, the fact that it operates to
provide a platform to employees especially the government servants where they
can share the sensitive documents without bothering their jobs. This
organization plays a pivotally important role for the journalists. On contrary
to this, the WikiLeaks is illegal as it breaches the copyright of the sources
form where it decipher data and publish it anonymously on its website.

The tug and pull
war has remained between the CIA and WikiLeaks but the consequences of the
recent published documents can be graver than ever before. As CIA is the only
civilian intelligence agency upon which the US government has trust and that
too it is a US based organization so it is obvious for the organizations to ask
the US government for its verdict.

Legal Issues  

Some easily comprehendible legal issues
associated with the CIA WikiLeaks are as follows:

1. These
   leaks are thought to be passed to the WikiLeaks by the contactors of the CIA:
   This assumption will lead to massive chaos in the CIA itself. For the time
   being the Central Intelligence Agency is not only facing the severe
   repercussions of the leaks published by the WikiLeaks and one of such
   repercussion to answer the companies like Apple and Google for violating their
   fundamental rights. This can impact the repute and credibility of the CIA. Not
   only this but also the US government can be alleged for being the driving force
   behind these bold steps taken by the CIA.
2. CIA
   breach is legally an alarming issue as it has direct political impact: Most
   certainly leakage of highly sensitive information is by no means legitimate and
   lawful. This unlawful element further gets elevated by its adverse and direct
   political impacts.
3. The
   Espionage Act-1971 is likely to be levied on the founder of the WikiLeaks as it
   was deemed once before as well: Once before in the history the founder of the
   WikiLeaks has been sued on the charge of violation and breaching of the basic
   and the most fundamental human rights. This time, the organization has taken a
   highly devastating step by all means and measures and it is expected and some
   people are hoping to sue the administration of the WikiLeaks as soon as
   possible.

Social Issues

The social issues of the WikiLeaks are as
much explicit as are the legal issues. Some important social issues of the
WikiLeaks are here under:

1. Manipulation
   of information is a big social issues as far as the CIA WikiLeaks are
   concerned: It is in human nature to inflict other humans. Organizations are
   also treated as human in international law and the present case says that not
   only the WikiLeaks has breached the fundamental rights but has also manipulated
   the information as the statement.
2. The
   website itself says that the administration has omitted some information from
   the documents which will be published later. It clearly shows that the
   manipulation of the information has been done by the WikiLeaks.
3. The
   general society claims to bother the common wellbeing of its citizens and the
   US government being the world super power claims to bring in peace and assure
   fundamental human rights of every human being across the globe. This claim is
   masked by stains as soon as the CIA WikiLeaks are published on the website.
4. Through
   these leaks the WikiLeaks have undoubtedly breached the social and legal rights
   of the CIA which has encouraged the society in general to breach fundamental
   rights which is a bad and dangerous precedent. Public has a different
   perception than the government or organizations. The ultimate deciphering of
   the message given by the WikiLeaks through this act is the encouragement of
   violation of fundamental human rights and by taking the responsibility openly
   as if no law-in-order can sue.

Social Issues

1. Freedom
   of Information: WikiLeaks have repeatedly been under attack of some vibrant
   criticism. It has always been levied on the organization that it violates basic
   human rights by publishing secrets which can have severe repercussions. The same
   matter is to be seen be with utter different perspective. The WikiLeaks
   believes that it has done nothing unlawful in past and nor will it do. As the organization
   calls its working principled leaking. It is very much obvious to believe that
   through this leak the WikiLeaks has actually emphasized on its stand for the
   freedom of information (Karhula, n.d).
2. Exposure
   of Wide Scale Government Corruption: Another important social factor of the
   WikiLeaks is that it has exposed the ruthless and the corrupt face of the
   governments over the time. It serves to raise the curtain and allows the public
   to have the real image. In this way society do not consider it to be unlawful
   and illegitimate because the purpose of the WikiLeaks suits the aspirations of
   the public. In societal terms the WikiLeaks enjoys a credible position in the
   public and it certainly means that the organization has the ability to
   influence the society at a larger scale. This factor counts to be an important
   consideration of government as well.

Legal Issues

An important issue
that the WikiLeaks had in the past and is evident in the present CIA leaks as
well is that does the WikiLeaks really know the difference between information
dump and journalism. This is the most debatable and hot questions. People have
spoken in favor of the WikiLeaks but in this regard the organization receive
more criticism. Whatsoever be the reason, it is quite certain that the
WikiLeaks have often dumped in the information in guise of journalism.

Perhaps the CIA
leakage and its aftermath is the perfect time for the international segregation
of journalists to stand against the organization. Here the emphasis is not on
the consequences of the leakage rather the important ethical issue is that why
is journalism being made confused with the information dump.

CONCLUSION

Government
hacking natives is a method for reconnaissance yet with the protection
demonstration my question is would we be able to truly know whether the records
and archives discharge by WikiLeaks are genuine and in the event that they are
genuine what the legislature is doing with all the observation and capacity.
Security Breach, Hacking and other type of system interruption will in any case
be here on the grounds that product, developers are advancing and the need to
secure programming and program we have to know their imperfections and the best
way to do that is to hack them. With this Leaks bunches of individuals will be
exceptionally cautious on what they put on the web and a few people will cover
their webcam on their portable PC or Smart TV.

Notwithstanding
news scope for the most part concentrating on spying capacities for shopper
level gadgets, there is a noiseless executioner prowling in the shadows of the
landfill: a few of the apparatuses discharged were non-malware assaults
(regularly called file less assaults or “living-off-the-arrive”
assaults). Non-malware assaults pick up control of PCs without downloading
noxious programming. Rather, they utilize trusted, local working framework
instruments, for example, PowerShell, and endeavor running applications, for
example, programs, to “live off the land.” These assaults represent a
greater hazard than malware assaults since they are harder to recognize and
cause more harm.

The
security business has seen the ascent of these assaults as lawbreakers and
spies utilize them more. The CIA was additionally abusing these assault
techniques — given that they’re an about imperceptible approach to rupture a
framework — yet the Vault 7 discharge gives these instruments to countless
noxious performers.  Non-malware assaults
will turn out to be more ordinary, more progressed and more incessant, and
security experts wherever should be on high ready. In light of past history, I
anticipate that WikiLeaks will make these vulnerabilities open quickly after
tech organizations make a fix. In the event that they take after this course,
will enable aggressors to utilize the devices to direct surgical strikes and weaponized
each benefit accessible.

I
couldn’t think about a superior contemporary occasion to identify with the
above cases then what was as of late discharged by the most advanced programmer
on the planet, WikiLeaks. Prior this month a large number of reports containing
modern programming apparatuses and procedures that were being utilized by the
C.I.A were discharged to the general population. This product was being
utilized by the organization to break into PCs, cell phones, and even SMART
TVs. Like the investigation of Flame Malware, these instruments the
organization has under lock and key could take advantage of Skype calls and
keep record of the discussion that occurred. I additionally think the WikiLeaks
discharge is firmly identified with Industrial Espionage through social building
in light of the fact that the burglary of touchy data occurred and mystery data
was traded off just without the utilization of an insider.

The
WikiLeaks hack is likewise identified with the North Korea hack on Sony on the
grounds that both utilized the internet for pressure. In any case, I don’t
think everybody would concur that the current WikiLeaks discharge was pressure.
With all due respect WikiLeaks states it was “pointing out the C.I.A’s
worldwide incognito hacking system, it’s malware munitions stockpile and many
weaponized misuses against an extensive variety of U.S. also, European
organization items, including Apple’s iPhone, Google’s Android and Microsoft
Windows and even Samsung TV’s, which are transformed into secret
receivers.” (Krebs, 2017) So was this WikiLeaks discharge done to
constrain or was it to advise general society of works on being utilized by our
Federal authorities.

I
trust consequential list principles ought to be connected while tending to the
issues raised by the WikiLeaks discharge. This moral standard expresses that
deciding if a demonstration is correct or wrong will rely on upon the outcomes
of the demonstration itself. I see it as the all the more great that can be
delivered by the outcomes, the better the demonstration was/is. As to WikiLeaks
arrival of data educating the general population that the CIA has the way to
hack into our own effects will make you feel somewhat uneasy. I question the
CIA has any enthusiasm for hacking into my SMART TV in my parlor since I am not
giving them motivation to. Be that as it may, in what capacity will this affect
our military abilities to spy and hack into fear based oppressor association
databases now that they know how the U.S. is doing it and what apparatuses we
are utilizing? I don’t think WikiLeaks had any expectations on disturbing
National Security rather they practiced their free press appropriate to
distribute data they think society ought to know. I simply wish WikiLeaks was
this forceful with psychological militant associations and would distribute
some of their insider facts.

REFERENCES

1. Khandelwal, S. (2017). 10 Things You Need To Know About ‘Wikileaks CIA Leak’. [online] The Hacker News. Available at: http://thehackernews.com/2017/03/wikileaks-cia-vault7-leak.html [Accessed 30 Apr. 2017].
2. Miller, G. and Nakashima, E. (2017). WikiLeaks says it has obtained trove of CIA hacking tools.[online] Washington    Post. Available at:https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/wikileaks-says-it-has-obtained-trove-of-cia-hacking-tools/2017/03/07/c8c50c5c-0345-11e7-b1e9-a05d3c21f7cf_story.html?utm_term=.a35ea025732e [Accessed 30 Apr. 2017].
3. Technewsworld.com. (2017). WikiLeaks Dumps CIA Hacking Docs Online | Cybersecurity | TechNewsWorld. [online] Available at: http://www.technewsworld.com/story/84353.html [Accessed 30 Apr. 2017].
4. Karhula, P. (n.d.). What is the effect of WikiLeaks for Freedom of Information?. [online] Available at: https://www.ifla.org/publications/what-is-the-effect-of-wikileaks-for-freedom-of-information [Accessed 26 Apr. 2017].
5. CNET. (2017). What is WikiLeaks?. [online] Available at:
   https://www.cnet.com/how-to/what-is-wikileaks/ [Accessed 30 Apr. 2017].