Anthropogenic climate change is a global issue around the world, to the extent that a culture of consumption – induced from a carbon-based economy – has contributed towards an average increase in temperatures for both developed and underdeveloped countries (Schmidt et al. 2013). The true scale of human influence on climate change has created different attitudes, perceptions and values towards the issue (Chakrabarty 2017). At an international level, the main problem is trying to mitigate climate change, but discrepancies in public attitudes from countries (e.g. USA) will have a global impact on the level of adaptation and mitigation that can take place (Schmidt et al. 2013). The media however, are sources of information for climate change, and can help develop social representations that are communicated to an audience. Depending on how the information can be perceived or expressed, it can promote mitigation in a positive manner; but different types of media will not have the same effect (Schmidt et al. 2013, Jaspal et al. 2014). Therefore, this essay will research into the insights of public attitudes from numerous different mediators, while assessing the impact on how climate change communications from the media can help mitigate the impacts that are created from climate change.
It is understood that how climate change is
perceived is more likely to be considered in countries that are affected by the
negative consequences (Schmidt et al. 2013). These perceptions are dependent on
a country’s geographical location; for example, Australia is a developed
country that is very exposed to impacts created by climate change (Chakrabarty
2017). However, despite the geographical location having an influence,
scientists will still face challenges when trying to communicate the risks and
consequences of climate change to a wider audience (Yale Forum 2014). The
reason for this is that there is great uncertainty about the full complexities
of the climate change concept, thus the audience that is being targeted needs
to be educated more effectively (Yale Forum 2014, Kirilenko et al. 2015). As a
consequence, knowledge that has been discussed from findings that have been
ineffectively communicated to the public can be interpreted in different ways
(Yale Forum 2014). This failure of communication results in part of the
population rejecting or misunderstanding the scientific concept that is
proposed, which is known as Information deficit theory (IDT) (Figure 1.0). (Yale Forum 2014, Olson 2011).
When governments go
to Global conferences (like the Paris 2015 agreement), they are not as equally
as resourced with public discussions in their own nation due the degree of
uncertainty (Chakrabarty 2017). The debates remain primarily focused on the
experience, values and desires of developed nations in relation to climate
change, particularly with the USA.
Addressing climate change in the USA is dependent on the mitigation
and adaptation policies at all levels, whether this is at a local, state or a
national scale (Howe et al. 2015). The public perceptions and attitudes in the
USA have large variations, with only 47% of the respondents from national
surveys believing that climate change is human caused, which is reinforced by
Figure 1.1 (Howe et al. 2015, Lee et al. 2015). The American efforts to
initiate climate change policies at a national level have been weakened, due to
the rise of the Tea Party Movement from 2009-2010 and the election of presidential
electorate Donald Trump, allowing a new Republican majority in the US House of
Representatives (Maibach 2012). The extreme weather events that act as an
indicator for climate change are geographically detached from most Americans,
which reinforces the skepticism of climate change for the majority of parties
involved in its discussion (Weber and Stern 2011). Clearly, sociodemographic and
ideological characteristics will also divide opinions and perceptions of how
climate change is perceived amongst the uncertainty (Smith and Leiserowitz 2013). In theory, when there are high levels of
uncertainty around a subject, individuals will look towards other groups to
understand the appropriate context of what is discussed (Spartz et al. 2015).
In order to understand complex scientific issues like Climate change, some Americans
will rely more on the media to understand the norms and values of pro-environmental
mitigation as well as the exchange of environmental information (Spartz et al.
2015).
Originally,
anthropogenic climate change became a public issue during the 1980s, the
scientific findings founded by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPPC) was focused by the media (Moser 2010). This nonstop coverage was central
for the discussion and legitimation of climate change (Schmidt et al. 2013),
but it also caused problems due to perceptions and awareness of audiences fluctuating
in relation to media attention cycles (Moser 2010). At the current day, climate
change is beyond what it used to be, as information is communicated through a
number of different forms that includes social media (Moser 2010, Whitmarsh et
al. 2013). Social media is becoming furtherly integrated into how stories are
covered and represented, which is important to understand as different media
types can socially represent climate change to specific contexts (Jaspal et al.
2014, Olteanu et al. 2015). For example, Leonardo DiCaprio’s 2016 Oscar Speech quoting
climate change had increased coverage from the traditional mainstream media,
but tweets including the terms: ‘global warming’ or ‘climate change’ had
reached new records to a much greater audience (Leas et al. 2016). This is
evidence to suggest that the way the information is expressed, can also
determine an individual’s motivation and how they can help to mitigate towards
climate change in a positive manner.
However, despite
these successes from the media, ideological factors and demographical factors
will still remain the same for some individuals. Therefore, climate change will
always be represented as a false concept in some way, which means that the
potential for mitigation to take place won’t be as successful as it should
(Jaspal et al. 2014). In order to facilitate changes, Leiserowitz (2007) argued
that the local and regional impact of climate change needs to be expressed, as
highlighting impacts may help to increase the level of public engagement with
issues related to climate change mitigation and adaptation (Taylor et al.
2014). Climate change is evidently a well-known issue, but the level of how it
is communicated effectively across from mediators worldwide cannot be known
(Schmidt et al. 2013).
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more