Behavioral Statistics

Researchers participating in this particular study were interested in evaluating whether occasional intervening consisting of personalized feedback can be utilized in the decreasing of alcohol abuse amongst college aged students. Research consisted of inclusion of content on personalized feedback of participants involved in the study. Methods of observation used in the experiment were; participants, measures, procedures, and results.

Participants were given the opportunity to participate in pre-intervention assessment and randomization, various conditions of feedback, a follow-up assessment, and opportunity for compensation. The heavy drinking of some students reaches levels of clinical significance (Wechsler 3).

In the research, statistical components incorporated consisted of summarization of participant’s drinking habits, how each individual participant’s drinking consumption compares to campus normatives, didactics pertaining to blood alcohol concentration (BAC), and estimation of calories consumed from alcohol binging. Face-to-face,
computerized, and controlled, represented the feedback conditions used by researchers. These criterion were meant to establish proof as to whether a prominent difference is achieved between those who are allotted the assistance of a clinician, a computerized feedback form, or simply the option of responding to a personalized feedback form. Researchers concluded that the face-to-face variable along with the computerized intervention variable both succeeded equally in assisting in alcohol consumption reduction, but awarded a slight favorable edge to the face-to-face intervention, while the
control condition, however, flagged behind both. Results deemed brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers via computerized intervention an efficient mechanism in the curving of alcohol abuse among the demographic. Works Cited Weshsler, H. and T. F. Nelson. “What We Have Learned From the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study: Focusing Attention on College Student Alcohol Consumption and the Environmental Conditions That Promote It. ” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2008; 69(4): 481-490.