Immigrant children brought to the United States illegally by their parents have lived their lives as Americans but are not citizens. Mexican immigrants have become the largest minority in the United States. In 2014, more than 11.7 million Mexican immigrants resided in the United States (Zong & Batolva, 2016). Without citizenship, young Latino Americans face economic and personal hardships that must be alleviated. A policy that provides a path to citizenship will allow them to secure basic necessities. They are called Dreamers because the initial 2001 legislation called the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (DREAM) was aimed at providing permanent residency to immigrant children. No Dream legislation has become law even bipartisan versions (Schmid, 2103). Dreamers are not citizens, so they are denied the ability to receive federal health care, federal student aid, a Social Security number or a driver’s license (Gonzalez, Terriques, & Ruszczyk, 2014). They are subject to deportation at any time. They are subject to deportation at any time. The threat adds stress to the lives of family members. Parents may be undocumented while some siblings may have birth citizenship. Dreamers are powerless and lack opportunity to pursue upward mobility.
A legislative policy path to citizenship
is proposed to provide equal opportunity for undocumented immigrant children
(primarily Latino) who meet certain criteria. Only Congress can give a path to
citizenship (Schmid, 2013). An
incremental policy for Dreamers who are proving their ability to contribute to
our economy gives them hope and incentive. The proposed policy may be
considered a mixture of a rational political model and the incremental model
building on a presidential executive order. The proposal has an element of
bounded rationality maximizing the greatest good while the political aspect
recognizes the value conflicts between parties (Cummins, Byers, and Pedirick,
2011). It is incremental as it is not proposing sweeping changes to our
immigration system thus increasing likelihood of passage. A synopsis of the
recent history of undocumented young adult policy is needed to analyze this
critical problem.
In 2013 by executive order, President Obama gave unauthorized immigrant Dreamers an opportunity to stay in America to study or work, but he did not give a path to citizenship. Dreamers cannot vote, are denied state welfare benefits even though they pay into Social Security, pay taxes, and are not fully included in communities (Schmid, 2013). Some of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) criteria to qualify for exemption from deportation includes a high school diploma, GED or currently in higher education, continuous residency since 2007, and absence of serious criminal convictions (Schmid, 2013). Almost all applicants are approved, given a work permit and renewable protection for two years. Nearly 790,000 Dreamers have received these benefits (Uwemadimo, Monterrey & Linton, 2017).
Research after DACA showed how recipients’ lives improved and gives evidence that immigrant policy change is needed. A web survey of DACA recipients revealed that 59% of respondents obtained a new job and 45% increased their salaries (Gonzalez, Terriquez & Ruszczyk, 2014). Young adults who did not apply for DACA, especially those of Mexican origin, will continue to face hardships. Dreamers who have not applied for DACA may have been discouraged by the $465 application and renewal fee, unable to document five years continuous presence, and lacked supportive help (Singer & Svajlenka, 2013). It is interesting to note that 75% of DACA applicants were born in Mexico and 75% have been here for at least ten years (Singer & Svajlenka, 2013). President Trump ended DACA in September 2017, and issued a March 5, 2018 deadline for Congress to agree on a policy. New applicants are not being accepted but renewals are allowed.
That deadline passed without
resolution but the courts have established current DACA recipients are
protected. Recently, President Trump’s offered a citizenship policy for all
young immigrants and included large monies for a border wall and limited family
sponsorship (legal migration) but it did not pass (Fram & Freking, 2018). The
demographic divide in the Republican Party provides support for the proposed
Dream Act of 2018 to pass. Research shows that by 57% to 34%, Republicans
younger than 50 support a policy to grant permanent legal status to immigrants
who came to the U.S. as undocumented (Tyson, 2018). Eighty percent of Democrats
support citizenship for undocumented children (Tyson, 2018).
The proposed Dream Act of 2018 is
needed to give Dreamers the basic human right to earn a living wage. There are
2.1 million Dreamers who are the primary stakeholders and the majority are
Mexican immigrants (Schmid, 2013). American citizens are stakeholders who will
benefit from young immigrant group contributing to our tax base. Young
immigrants buy American goods and services stimulating our economy. President
Trump is a stakeholder whose conservative voting bloc does not advocate citizenship.
Congress and Senate members are stakeholders whose position is shaped by their
constituents, loyalty to the President and personal beliefs. Employees of the
U.S, Citizenship and Immigration Service are stakeholders. Border patrol and
the National Guard are stakeholders who may risk harm to themselves.
Businessmen and agricultural landowners are stakeholders who need immigrant
workers.
Realistic consensus among stakeholders
must work to narrow the issue, address the reasons for Republican resistance,
and increase overall public support through education. Republican senators will
negotiate with Democrats as they did in 2013, creating a bill based on a merit
point-based citizenship path (Preston, 2013). However, there were too many
stakeholders including agriculture growers and technology companies for that
major policy change to pass (Preston, 2013). A new Dream act is needed because
the Dream Act of 2017 has been in subcommittees since July, 2017 (“The Dream
Act,” 2017).
The policy proposed is the
merit-based Dream Act of 2018, a mixed policy model with the incremental model
predominating with rational political elements. One policy option is to include
all Dreamer (undocumented or DACA documented). The other option is to include
only DACA documented young adults. This proposal includes all Dreamers because
those not DACA documented have no citizenship rights. This option alleviates
the most hardships for the most young adults. It is in harmony with the
National Association of Social Worker’s directive to prevent and eliminate
discrimination while empowering individuals.
Building
a coalition of public and private supporters called the Our Dream Coalition is the first step in passage of the new Dream
Act of 2018. The second step is to advocate for the proposed Dream Actor of
2018. The Our Dream Coalition’s mission
statement is, “Together we can succeed as citizens.” DACA coalitions already exist but this coalition
will focus on bill passage and education to correct immigrant misconceptions. The
second step includes formulating the bill and introducing the bill to the
Senate and Congress in 2018.
The Our Dream Coalition will consist of social workers, DACA recipients,
Catholic Charities U.S.A., the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American
Immigration Council. DACA recipients provide personal narrative impact.
Catholic Charities U.S.A. provides an extensive local outreach communication
system through its universities and churches. Catholic Charities has already
urged President Trump to continue DACA. The American Academy of Pediatrics
provides an authority voice and large membership base. Research show how lack
of citizenship hurts health (Uwemadimo et al., 2017). The American Immigration
Council is a source of recent immigration law defense. Paul Zulkie is board
chairman who has testified before Congress and would lend expertise to bill
passage (“American Immigration Council Board,” n.d.). The coalition would have
a communication, and education and a legislative task force.
The Our Dream communication
task force would have two tasks. One task would be to maintain a website that
would engage the general public. The second task would be to maintain
communication with member organizations to encourage their membership support.
The coalition website should be user-friendly. It would include the proposed
bill outline, a call for support by clicking on a petition button, emailing,
calling or writing a legislator information with links, local church and university
addresses by state, event information, membership information, a donation
request and a link to the fact sheets of the American Immigration Council. A
blogging column could be an empowerment tool for DACA recipients. The
communication task force would send newsletters, distribute flyers, print facts
in church bulletins, and conduct forums. School forums could generate
grassroots movements.
An
education task force would educate legislators and the public. Data for legislator
concerns is emailed to legislators and displayed on the website. For example,
some believe that immigrants overload our social welfare system. First
generation children including DACA recipients pay more in taxes over their
lifetime than they receive in benefits (Bier, 2017). DACA has not led to an
increase in illegal Mexican immigration. Illegal Mexican immigration has slowed
due to Mexico’s improved job outlook (Zong and Batalova, 2016). Without DACA,
our Gross Domestic Product would lose $460 billion over the next decade. In
fact, Texas would lose $6 billion in 10 years if DACA was discontinued
(Svajlenka & Bautista-Chavez, 2017). The American Immigration Council
publishes state specific immigrant data that would be sent to the respective
legislators.
The legislative task force would
create a bill with three steps to citizenship modeled after the Dream Act of
2017 (“The Dream Act,” 2017). Step 1
gives conditional permanent residence. It includes anyone entering the U.S.
under the age of 18 and has been continuously present for three years. They
must be attending higher education, received a high school diploma or GED, and
not convicted of a crime with a sentence of more than 1 year. Step 2 allows anyone who has conditional
permanent residence to move to lawful permanent residence if they have been in
higher education or the military for two years or employed for three years.
Step 3 moves to citizenship after three years of lawful status reduced to two
years if still in the military or still pursuing higher education. (“The Dream Act,” 2017). It is a simplified
version that has three 3- year requirements for nine years of continuous residency,
or seven/eight years for college attendees or military personnel. English
language proficiency and initial health exam would apply. The 2017 Dream Act has
longer residency requirements. This proposal allows immigrants and the
Immigration Bureau to better track progess. David Kerwin of the Migration
Policy Institute has stated, “Congress has consistently found it necessary to
legalize discrete immigrant population that has fallen outside the legal
immigration system (Kerwin, 2010, p. 10).”
The
legislative task force would organize coalition advocacy at the major points of
bill passage. Coalition lobbying to both House and Senate Judiciary subcommittee
members would occur when the bill is assigned to committee. Senate Subcommittee
Border and Immigration Chair Senator John Cornyn (R-T) and Minority Ranking
Member Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) are strategic players. Senator Durbin
supports legislation for all Dreamers. In the House, Chair Congressman Bob
Goodlatte (R- VA) is an adversary while Minority Ranking Member Jerry Nadler
(D-NY) is a defender of immigrants.
The subcommittee would be addressed by a
coalition professional testimony. Emails would be sent including state specific
immigration fact sheets from the American Immigration Council. Local press
would be sent the same information. As the bill is introduced to full committee
and then to both floors, a support plea to email legislators would be sent to
coalition members. The coalition would monitor negotiation in conference
committee. Texting the President would be appropriate!
Successful passage of
the proposed legislation would be evaluated by measuring improvement in the
lives of Dreamers. Outcome evaluation data can be provided by the Immigration
and Citizenship Bureau. Social research would provide evidence of
effectiveness. Research questions after passage would include: Was the poverty
rate decreased?; How many Dreamers were able to increase their salaries?; What
characteristics are associated with citizenship application?. Since citizenship
is not immediate, studies would be longitudinal. The Our Dream Coalition would show the public that such legislation for
immigrants is worthy.
The proposed Dream Act of 2018 is based on research showing DACA recipients’ success in improving their standard of living. The American economy would suffer without the benefit of Dreamer workers and consumers. A simplified version of past failed Dream Acts was proposed with a realization that some security monies may be amended to the act. The Our Dream Coalition was proposed to create support by correcting misconceptions about young immigrants. The words of Emma Lazaruz on the Statue of liberty are at the heart of this bill proposal, “Give me your tired, you’re poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more