China’s environment has suffered
serious consequences due to the rapid growth and development occurring over the
last few decades. As China began to emerge as a leader in the global market its
infrastructure transformed to accommodate the transition. As a result, China’s
natural environment was and has continued to be neglected. The people of China
are now dealing with the fallout of the unregulated rapid urbanization that has
made them into the world power they see today. First, I will discuss how
industrialization effects pollution and creates potential health hazards.
Second, the paper will focus on how the population in China affects the environment.
Thirdly, I will analyze the governments environmental policies and examine the
issues with the current regulations. In conclusion, I will debate whether the
development of China is more important than the ecosystem around it.

            In 1978, an open-door policy was
established in China in response to an economic recession. This policy allowed
for foreign investment in China from the Western World and sparked an enormous
amount of economic growth and removal of people from poverty (Zhang,
Z. 2013). Throughout this course of development China valued
industry and manufacturing over the environment. China has had the world’s
fastest growing economy for nearly thirty years which has resulted in them
becoming the world’s largest manufacturing economy. Additionally, since 2009,
China has become the largest exporter and second largest importer of goods (Bo Tang.
2015). China’s acceptance of globalization has propelled them towards a higher
level of international influence and power. In recent years, China’s Going
Global policies had only increased their development, further expanding on
efforts to diversify the market and receive raw materials.

China’s level of production requires massive amounts of energy and
gas, resulting in an immense distribution of greenhouse gases and carbon. In China,
widespread accounts of air pollution and water pollution are frequently
reported. In a recent account, due to levels of pollution, the climate in China
is changing and water and soil area, which accounts for around forty percent of
total surface area, have disappeared and eroded into desert sand. From 1990 to
2004 China experienced six-hundred and thirty-six percent growth, this was
further accompanied by a thirty-six percent increase in total waste water
discharge and a hundred and seventy-eight percent increase in gas emission (Dongyong,
Z. 2007). The correlation between the levels of production and the negative
impact on the environment are obvious. These factors combined can leave lasting
effects on the environment and thus, multiple health risks.

China’s industrialization has improved the standard of living for
the entirety of the country and has helped life millions of people out of
poverty. However, the risk of serious health issues has only continued to rise due
to pollutants caused by industrialization: these only grow increasing more
dangerous and more common as China develops. Environmental issues, such as
unclean drinking water and difficult to breath air, produce many negative
health outcomes. A thick light grey smog has formed in some parts of China due
to the toxins in the air making it difficult to breathe. The Environmental
Protection Agency reported that small particles in the air from pollutants are
the reason for a large number cardiovascular and respiratory diseases in China (Kira,
Matus. 2012). According to the Berkeley Earth report, 1.6 million people die each
year in China from air pollution related illnesses. Air pollution is mainly
produced by coal, automobiles, and industrial dust. The air the people of China
are breathing could be endangering their lives and put further economic
development at risk if the smog permits.

The environmental weakness of China has come to affect an industry
that has been dominated by the country for years. Contaminated water supply has
caused fish in regions of China to die off or become inedible due to high
counts of toxins. Consuming the contaminated fish can lead to heightened risk
of various other diseases, such as cancer. China produces around seventy
percent of farmed fish in the world. Often fish farmers will keep pesticides,
fish waste, and veterinary drugs in their waters without treatment and
discharge the contaminants into open water, increasing amounts of toxic water
(Mark Wang. 2008). Many waterways near one of the largest ports in Fuqing,
China have been shut down after the discovery of heavy metals such as lead, mercury,
copper and even oil in the water. Dongzhang Reservoir, a source of water for
hundreds of thousands of people, was denoted as unfit for the human body by the
government (Xu, H. 2002). If
China is not careful many more natural sources will be destroyed and damaged
beyond repair.

China is infamous for their air pollution and water pollution, a
neglected environmental element subjected to pollution is the soil. In a recent
study, it was found that the Chinese food supply is at risk: one-fifth of the
land in China is polluted with chemicals such as lead, cadmium, and arsenic. The
chemicals are known for promoting cancer and have developed “cancer villages”.  Cancer villages are communities near
industrial plants and areas of high production that face high death rates due
to the pollution or effects of the industrial plants. Often the residents get
sick by drinking contaminated water or eating food grown in contaminated soil. China
needs to produce as much food as possible due to their high population
therefore farmers use as much land as possible even if it is near mines or
industrial plants (Liu, L. 2010). As China’s population grows more and more people will be effected
by the large amounts of natural resource pollution.

A major contributing factor to the large amounts of pollution in
China is the extremely high numbers in population. China’s population is the
largest in the world according to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) it
totals to over 1.3 billion people. This amounts to around one-fifth of the
entire world’s population. The population of China was not always this large
but as the country developed and the standard of living increased due to modernization,
a boom in the population occurred. In the 1950’s China’s population was around
500 million and in the early 1980’s the population doubled to one billion. The
Chinese government was aware of their dangerously high numbers and developed a
policy to slow down their population growth rate. The one-child policy was
introduced in 1979, it was the government’s attempt to control the population
size, by restricting urban families from having more than one child. Only
families in high populated areas were subjected to the policy and there was no
penalty for having twins. To have more than one child a family would have to be
willing to pay a tax to the government (Feng, W. 2013).

The one-child policy was extremely contentious. Many scholars have
argued the benefits as well as the negative consequences due to the policy and
hypothesized the future effects. Much of the discussion has centered around the
positive impact the policy has made on the environment, but as a social issue
has caused much controversy and debate (Saka, A. 2014). In 2016, China has
changed the policy to include two children per household. Many people fear that
the already massive use of energy and resources used by China will increase at
a faster rate due to presumably more people. The sustainability of China is
being put into question (Lancet, T. 2013).
As the population grows in urban areas the government of China must combat the
growth by enforcing more environmental policies.

The size of China’s population is beginning to pose a threat for
forestation. The deforestation rate in China is around 1.2 percent, in 1984
forest land in China was 12 percent then in 1988 it dropped rapidly to 8.4
percent. Researchers attribute this to the spike in population and the growing
need for cooking and heating fuel. In rural areas, 60 million cubic meters of
wood are used each year to produce heat in households and for cooking. A result
of the deforestation scientists in China are have noticed rivers drying up and
the climate changing (Li, J. 1990). The wildlife in China are anguishing;
because of deforestation, many habits are being destroyed for the use of
production. The change in the land is disrupting the flow of nutrients thus
making it increasingly difficult for animals to survive (Zhai, D. 2015). The
Chinese government needs to implement stricter laws and policies to reduce the
harm created by the large population size.

Nevertheless, the large
population of China is realizing the damage development is causing the
environment and are taking the initiative to fix it. The population is
suffering the backlash from big industries polluting their communities
breathing air and drinking water. Due to the country’s severe environmental
conditions many people have become distraught and are now gaining more
knowledge of legal environmental laws to combat the industry (Xie, L. 2011). Non-Government
Organizations (NGO) are being established across the nation to hold companies
accountable on behalf of the people. The internet is another tool the
population is fighting industry by spreading awareness on a global-scale of the
issues China is facing. Many issues dealing with environmental degradation are
because of the large size of China’s population however, the responsiveness of
the citizens is helping China move in a better direction towards a more
ecofriendly future (Wu, F. 2013). It is now up to the
branches of government in China to change their ideals of production.

            Many of the environmental issues
China is currently facing can be attributed to the lax environmental policies
the government enforces. Around the time of China’s rapid development, China
created a foundation for environmental protection called the Environmental
Protection Law. This law was derived from regulations in the United States, the
central government has very specific guidelines but the supervising of the
industries is up to the discretion of the local officials. The law frequently
stresses pollution and remains focused on preventing further harm to the
environment as well as protocol on how to discharge waste. At the time, the
local government favored the rapid production and growth of industry and
ignored the law. Over time, the negative environment issues expanded further
until the problem could not be ignored. Amounting pressures from foreign
nations and the health of the population forced the national government to
combat the environmental crisis (Kuntao,
L., & Wenzeng, L. 2004).

            The Chinese government has been more
proactive in recent years in terms of preventing further pollution and have
since revised the Environmental Protection Law. This is the first revision to
the law since 1989 and offers the most severe punishments to large polluters. The
current law, active as of 2015, gives more power to governmental environment
agencies. They can enforce stricter penalties and halt production if a company
breaks the law. Company executives will also face extreme punishment, such as a
15-day jail sentencing, and fines are not limited to any dollar amount. In the
past, local governments have not enforced the national environmental
regulations in favor of production, the has been addressed: they will be
disciplined for not enforcing the law (Falk, R. L., & Wee, J. 2015). The people of China are also
encouraged to recycle and practice other means of environmental friendly
protection. China’s central government has made it clear that dealing with
pollution is the number one priority.

            China is financially dedicated to
trying their best to fix the pollution that is haunting their country. They
have issued an initiative called the Five-Year Plan that will map out the
future of the country’s economic spending, society, and environmental
rehabilitation from 2016 until 2021. The plan will increase investment towards
the treatment of environmental pollution, they have even surpassed the U.S. to
have the highest investment in renewable resources. The previous focus of the
nation was solely on the production of goods and establishing themselves as a powerhouse
in the foreign market. The new plan recognizes that to raise the standard of
living and encourage growth in the economy they must improve the quality of the
environment. Some specific goals include a reduction if industry gas emissions,
greater control over air pollution, and the increased use of electricity and
natural gas instead of coal. The Five-Year Plan comes as a major development
after already decreasing numbers in some categories of pollution and waste
discharge as of 2014; however, China is mindful that even though the numbers
are declining they are still amongst the worst of any nation (Li, S., Wang, H., & He, J. 2016).

            Foreign nations have noticed the
struggle China faces in dealing with such intense environmental issues and are
willing to combat the problems together. The United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is the United States’ governmental agency that protects
the environment and enforces related laws. They have been in collaboration with
China’s Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) for over three decades. The
role of the EPA is to lend experience and help support China with their
environmental initiatives and priorities. The MEP has only around 600 full time
staffers compared to the EPA’s 6000 (EPA. 2017). According to the EPA, China
has placed a strong framework for environmental law but the next focus should
be on unifying the local and central government. Multiple programs between MEP
and the EPA are in place such as climate change, improving air quality, and
getting clean water.

China has emerged as a world leader throughout the last 40 years due
to rapid economic development. A serious trade-off occurred between development
and the protection of the environment due to unregulated urbanization. China chose
to focus on establishing production and the manufacturing industry, at the cost
of the surrounding ecosystem. Today, the large amount of pollution has resulted
in devastating health effects for the people of China and as a result, The
Republic of China must spend billions each year to repair the damaged it caused
(Albert, E., & Xu, B. 2014, Feb). The consequences of no regulation or enforcement by the government
has made China the number one polluter in the world. Combined with the
population boom in the 1980’s China must use huge amounts of gas, coal, and
energy each year to maintain the consumption of the people. Due to the
excessive production and emission of poisonous gases in the air the people of
China have developed a variety of illnesses and have faced significant climate
change.

 However, the development of China was extremely beneficial for the people of China to a certain extent; significant improvement in the standard of living, doubling the age of life expectancy and staggering drops in absolute poverty amongst the people prove that the surge in China’s excessive production had positive effects as well (Sinding, S. W. 2009). The continuous overproduction is at the cost of the environment. The pressure of foreign nations and the people have made it apparent that the environmental issues grew too large to ignore. Throughout the 2000’s China has switched focus from industry to environmental reform while still maintaining high levels of production and growth. This transition is necessary to sustain an essential balance for the future of China.

Reference:

• Albert, E., & Xu, B. (2014, Feb). China’s Environmental Crisis. Retrieved Mar, 2017.
• Bo Tang, Real exchange rate and economic growth in China: A cointegrated VAR approach, China Economic Review, Volume 34, July 2015, Pages 293-310, ISSN 1043-951X,               http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.12.002.
• (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X14001680)
• Dongyong, Z., Kambhampati, U., & Morse, S. (2007). Economic growth and the environment in Transitional China—an old topic with new perspectives. Journal Of International Development, 19(6), 765-779. doi:10.1002/jid.1406
• EPA Collaboration with China. (2017, March 09). Retrieved March 20, 2017, from https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/epa-collaboration-china
• Falk, R. L., & Wee, J. (2015). China’s New Environmental Protection Law. Environmental Law Reporter: News & Analysis, 45(1), 10023-10026.
• Feng, W., Cai, Y., & Gu, B. (2013). Population, Policy, and Politics: How Will History Judge China’s One-Child Policy? Population and Development Review,38, 115-129. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23655290
• Kira Matus, Kyung-Min Nam, Noelle E. Selin, Lok N. Lamsal, John M. Reilly, Sergey Paltsev, Health damages from air pollution in China, Global Environmental Change, Volume 22, Issue 1, February 2012, Pages 55-66, ISSN 0959-3780, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.08.006.               (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378011001233)
• Kuntao, L., & Wenzeng, L. (2004). Introduction to China’s Environmental Protection Laws. Chinese Education & Society, 37(3), 21-25.
• Lancet, T. (2013). The two-child policy in china: What to expect?The Lancet, 382(9907), 1758.            doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62534-9
• Li, J. (1990). Comment: Population Effects on Deforestation and Soil Erosion in China. Population and Development Review, 16, 254-258. doi:10.2307/2808075
• Li, S., Wang, H., & He, J. (2016). Analysis of implementation of china ‘ s 12th five year plan and prospects of its next five years.Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 9(1), 40-59. Retrieved from    https://proxy.geneseo.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1765932819?a            countid=11072
• Liu, L. (2010). MADE IN CHINA: CANCER VILLAGES.Environment, 52(2), 8-21. Retrieved from https://proxy.geneseo.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/580120978?accountid=11072
• Mark Wang, Michael Webber, Brian Finlayson, Jon Barnett, Rural industries and water pollution in China, Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 86, Issue 4, March 2008, Pages 648-659, ISSN 0301-4797, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.019. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479706004130)
• Saka, A. (2014). Urban population growth and the environment in china: An investigation. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 4(1), 137-149. Retrieved from            https://proxy.geneseo.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1501427842?a            countid=11072
• Sinding, S. W. (2009). Population, poverty and economic development. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1532), 3023–3030. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0145
• Wu, F. (2013). Environmental activism in provincial china. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 15(1), 89-108. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2013.763634
• Xie, L. (2011). China’s environmental activism in the age of globalization. Asian Politics & Policy, 3(2), 207+. Retrieved from  http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=EAIM&sw=w&u=geneseo&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE            7CA256281097&sid=summon&asid=b949440d216302035e717f0271ac7ffb
• Xu, H. (2002). An assessment of land use changes in fuqing county of china using remote sensing technology.Chinese Geographical Science, 12(2), 126-135.
• Zhang, Z. (2013). Energy, Climate and Environmental Policy in China: Introduction to the Special Double Issue. Energy & Environment, 24(7/8), 1201-1208.   doi:10.1260/0958-305X.24.7-8.1201
• Zhai, D., Cannon, C. H., Dai, Z., Zhang, C., & Xu, J. (2015). Deforestation and fragmentation of natural forests in the upper changhua watershed, hainan, china: Implications for    biodiversity conservation.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(1), 1-4137.            doi:http://proxy.geneseo.edu:2108/10.1007/s10661-014-4137-3