Self-directed learning is the process of learning in which the individual person takes the initiative for their learning and holds themselves responsible for their learning. An estimated seventy percent of adult learning is self-directed learning (Cross, 1981). To get a better understanding of what self-directed learning is it may be important to compare this style of learning to how most of us probably learned when we were in school Knowles (1975) explains the difference between teacher directed learning and self-directed learning as seen in Table 1.
Teacher Directed Learning |
Self-Directed Learning |
The teacher decides what and how the learner is taught |
As people mature they grow into self-directed learners |
The teacher’s role is to share their experiences and the experiences of the textbook and material producers |
Learner has experiences that should be shared |
Curriculum is organized in units of study |
Problem-based learning |
External rewards and punishments |
Internal motivation |
“Many self-directed learners are attempting to gain new skills, knowledge, and attitudes to improve their work performance. Others conduct their self-directed learning to improve family life and health, enjoy the arts and physical recreation, participate in a hobby, or simply increase their intellectual capital” (Lowry, 1989). “Not all adults prefer the self-directed option, and even the adults who practice self-directed learning also engage in more formal educational experiences such as teacher-directed courses” (Brookfield, 1985).
Ash (1985), Bauer (1985), Brockett and Hiemstra (1985), Brookfield (1985), Cross (1978), Hiemstra (1982, 1985), and Reisser (1973) provide ideas on how to lead the self-directed learning process:
Based on my readings and learning about self-directed learning I decided that I would like to find out how other educators feel about staff trainings and what type of learning they feel best meets their learning style(s) and needs. I conducted a brief online survey in which I received seventy-one responses from all over the United States and Canada. Table 2 gives a breakdown of the demographics that responded to my survey.
Age Range |
20-30 31-40 41-50 51-65 66 and over |
17% 31% 27% 24% 1% |
Sex |
Male Female |
1% 99% |
Race/Ethnicity |
White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic Other |
89% 4% 6% 1% |
Educational Attainment |
Some college Bachelor’s degree Master’s degree Doctorate |
1% 51% 45% 3% |
Employment |
Classroom educator Administration Substitute Student teacher/observer Other |
70% 7% 1% 1% 6% |
The second part of my survey focused on staff development and trainings that educators have participated in and the types they feel are most beneficial to them in regards to how they learn. The results are shown below in Table 3.
Continuing Education Required |
Yes No |
80% 20% |
Attends Continuing Education |
Yes No |
85% 15% |
Type(s) of Training Attended |
Face-to-Face Online Teleconferences Book Study College Coursework Mentoring Informal Other |
71% 31% 7% 14% 36% 5% 5% 10% |
Type(s) of Training Most Beneficial as a Learner |
Face-to-Face Online Teleconferences Book Study College Coursework Mentoring Informal Other |
73% 15% 0% 17% 21% 17% 8% 4% |
Participates in non-work related classes |
Yes No |
20% 80% |
What I find interesting about the results of the survey is that people spend a good majority of their adult learning focused on work-related learning and that the majority of workers are required to participate in such learning. Could this be because people are not self-motivated to learn outside of the required learning, are they too busy with other commitments, or just not interested? When the survey participants were asked about what factors they consider when deciding on training courses their results were as follows:
Maybe those that are in charge of conducting adult learning courses are not taking into consideration some of the ideas mentioned earlier in reaching those adult learners. Google has done a great job in meeting these self-directed learning ideas through the use of their Innovative Time Off program. Employees are encouraged to take 20 percent of their time to work on something that personally interests them and is company related. Mediratta (2007) said “It sounds obvious, but people work better when they’re involved in something they’re passionate about, and many cool technologies have their origins in 20 percent time, including Gmail, Google News and even the Google shuttle buses that bring people to work at the company’s headquarters in Mountain View, California.”
When people are inspired they are more likely to take on learning opportunities. As educators and leaders it is our job to reach the adult learner by meeting their needs and making connections with them.
Autodidactic Press presents a list of additional self-directed learners on their website. I have always been interested in what motivates learners and what qualities they possess. Being a math teacher of course Albert Einstein is of high interest to me. I use a lot of his educational background to motivate my students and to let them know that there is no obstacle that can get in their way when it comes to learning mathematics. Here are a few of the other famous learners that have always interested me and how they have accomplished great things while being self-directed:
Gibbons, Bailey, Comeau, Schmuck, Seymour, & Wallace (1980) analyzed the biographies of twenty experts that have no formal education beyond high school in search of commonalities that might give insight on how people become self-directed in learning and accomplishments effectively. An overview of their list of their twenty subjects in Table 3 and their list of forty characteristics in Table 4 leads to conclusions about what makes a self-directed learner.
1. Virginia Woolf 2. Charlie Chaplin 3. Harry S. Truman 4. Frank Lloyd Wright 5. Walt Disney 6. George Bernard Shaw 7. Wilbur Wright 8. Will Rogers 9. Muhammad Ali 10. Harry Houdini |
11. H.L. Mencken 12. Aaron Copeland 13. Pablo Picasso 14. John L. Lewis 15. Gerald Durrell 16. Ralph Edwards 17. Amelia Earhart 18. Henry Ford 19. Malcolm X 20. Eric Hoffer |
1. Primary Experience in the Area 2. Industrious 3. Perseverance 4. Self-Disciplined Study 5. Curiosity 6. Single-minded Pursuit 7. Creativity 8. Ingenuity 9. Self-Confidence 10. Natural Ability 11. Assertiveness 12. Intelligence 13. Independent Exploration 14. Observation 15. Confirmational Support from Others 16. Integrity 17. Nonconformity 18. Ambition 19. Effect of the Economic Environment 20. Effect of Personal Major Achievements |
21. Physical Good Health 22. Altruistic Motives 23. Sensitivity to Others 24. Development of Interest in Youth 25. Personal Charisma 26. Avid Reading (specific to field) 27. An Incident that Led to a New Perspective 28. Emotionally Warm Family Environment 29. A Primary Relationship is Vital to Life and Career 30. Psychological Good Health 31. Conflict in the Field of Expertise 32. Strong Personal Guiding Principles 33. Busy, Active Home Atmosphere 34. Optimism 35. Pleasing Appearance 36. Family Coherence 37. Evidence of Good Memory 38. Mother Was Major Parental Influence 39. Accident-Free Life 40. Sense of Humor |
As a result of a student’s reaction to his teaching method, Grow (1991, 1996) found a method to reorganize his understanding of teaching. The Staged Self-Directed Learning (SSDL) Model (Grow, 1991) offers suggestions on how teachers can lead students to be more self-directed learners (Table 5). The teacher’s role is to lead students through the stages.
Student |
Teacher |
Examples |
|
Stage 1 |
Dependent |
Authority, Coach |
Coaching with immediate feedback. Drill. Informational lecture. Overcoming deficiencies and resistance. |
Stage 2 |
Interested |
Motivator, guide |
Inspiring lecture plus guided discussion. Goal-setting and learning strategies. |
Stage 3 |
Involved |
Facilitator |
Discussion facilitated by teacher who participates as equal. Seminar. Group projects. |
Stage 4 |
Self-Directed |
Consultant, delegator |
Internship, dissertation, individual work or self-directed study-group. |
The final part of my online survey for educators focused on how the participants described themselves as a teacher (how their class is run) and as a learner (how they learn best) in regards to the stages of self-directed learning in regards to Grow’s (1991) SSDL. Table 6 displays the results of the survey. One thing that I have noticed from the results of this survey is that many educators do not teach in the manner that they perceive to be the way they learn the best. So, are educators taking into account the varying ways that students (of any age) learn? How does this affect the students, the learner?
Yourself as a Teacher |
Yourself as a Learner |
|
Stage 1- Dependent StudentTeacher as Coach |
6% |
23% |
Stage 2- Interested StudentTeacher as Guide |
30% |
22% |
Stage 3- Involved StudentTeacher as Facilitator |
40% |
35% |
Stage 4- Self-Directed StudentTeacher as Consultant |
12% |
23% |
Grow (1991) states that “problems occur when dependent learners are mismatched with non-directive teachers and when self-directed learners are mismatched with highly directive teachers.” Table 7 displays the match and mismatch between learner stages and teacher styles.
Student 4: Self-Directed Learner |
Severe Mismatch: Student resent authoritarian teacher |
Mismatch |
Near Match |
Match |
Student 3: Involved Learner |
Mismatch |
Near Match |
Match |
Near Match |
Student 2: Interested Learner |
Near Match |
Match |
Near Match |
Mismatch |
Student 1: Dependent Learner |
Match |
Near Match |
Mismatch |
Severe Mismatch: Students resent freedom they are not ready for |
Teacher 1: Authority Expert |
Teacher 2: Motivator |
Teacher 3: Facilitator |
Teacher 4: Delegator |
So I do I become a more self-directed learner? Guglielmino & Guglielmino (2003) suggests ways that one can enhance your readiness for self-direction in learning (SDL) and become a more ACTIVE learner:
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more