Timothy C. (2002) had found that “Free will is the philosophical term ability’s rational choice to choose a certain type of action. What kind of freewill is worry about?” Generally speaking, what we concern about the philosophers will argue this problem, because almost two millennium of all philosopher has to say something about a large number of philosophers assume the concept of freewill is close connecting of the concept of moral responsibility. Do the things with freewill, it is to justify, and get ready to have the responsibility.

The established positions of determinism are hard determinism, indeterminism and soft determinism. The challenge of determinism is the principle of determinism states that every event has a cause. For example if the computer runs out of power, it will shut down automatically. What defines the term – “hard determinist” is the additional belief that every event has its sufficient natural cause, a thought or action will be free only if it is uncaused. Indeterminists maintain that universal does not apply to our mental life in the way that it applies to the natural world and the soft determinism is also called, because it claims that soft determinism and free will are compatible so we can have both.

“Free-Will: Does any person have the freedom to transport their body to the moon, to float above the earth? Obviously we can build machines to do this, but in every case our freedom is limited by physical reality and the laws of nature – and we know this in everything we do.” (A Simple Solution to the Problem of Free Will & Determinism) Here are some examples: driving cars, walking, using lights at night. The important distinction is to say that we have Limited Free Will among the reason for this distinction will become apparent very shortly when we solve this problem. Similarly, does determinism the certain kind of things is sure? Indeed, we can estimate the short things in the small space. Therefore, we can judge the future position of sun and globe, however, in a limited fatalism.

In 100 million years we did not question what would become the idea of ​​the Earth. Determinism is a theory that each person’s action is by the previous event, and not by the will of the exercise. In philosophy, the theory is built on the foundation of metaphysics, on the other hand, it is possible, theoretically, uncaused events. Scientists discovered the causes of which some type of action in this case the success of control tend to support this rule. “In philosophy discussion, the reason of connection is one of the two soul’s complementation activity. It will go for teacher’s choice and decision, and the reason is deliberation and argument. Thus a rational act would be an exercise of the will performed after due deliberation.”¼ˆ G S Davis, Free Will ¼‰

Jean Paul Sartre and other contemporary philosophers have argued that “determinism is controverter by introspection, which reveals actions to be the result of our own choices and not necessitated by previous events or external factors. Determinists respond that such experiences of freedom are illusions and that introspection is an unreliable and unscientific method for understanding human behavior.”(G S Davis, Free Will)

Fatalism is fatal, and sometimes mixed together, because this and determinism, which asserts that it is not from one thing, but from external causes and effects of the command, no one has an inevitable fatal arrangements. Historically, the core issue of this debate the freedom of the will, is of human behavior and moral responsibility, the most important analysis.

Philosophers think that people tend to have such a situation; they have the option of action, whether do it or not, can or can not. If all of the action can be established, the project may not exist. In the philosophy of mind, the question is whether the reasons are the same in his heart or restore events in the brain, and if so, to determine whether physical activity choices, decisions and behavior. Thus, there are various answers have been proposed, including those from Freudian psychoanalysis and behaviorism in various forms. Some philosophers in the analytic tradition that “Determinism is a reason for the decision and the cause of the problem; the two issues are mutually exclusive. This issue has been controversial. “æœ-读

显示对应的拉丁å­-符的拼音

å­-å…¸

“It is essential to note that determinists do not say that some actions of some people are determined. Holders of the free will doctrine also say that. They say that all human acts are determined.”(Coburn, John. Free Will, Predestination and Determinism, p144) Hence, determinism is a philosophical position according to which all human actions are predetermined. According to it, a person in a given situation may think that he could do this or that, but in every case of the stars, the laws of physics, his character, the conditioning he has received or something else makes him unable to do much but one thing only.

It would be possible to set out the determinist position with a criticism of it, and present the arguments for it, then replying to each one before going on to the next. The problem with this method is that it does not let the determinist world-picture form in the reader’s mind. Therefore, first propose determinism and the reasons for it, without critical comments; this method has some disadvantages such as it separates the arguments from my replies to them, believing that both alternatives are possible, and someone has freely chosen to use it.

Plato’s moral knowledge, in the heart, and I have used the same wisdom is a wonderful love. What problem is not intellectual knowledge, but emotional orientation that takes a form of love and respect for others? This love the feeling of caring or respect, they relate to their pain and sorrow, and are prepared to put some people to help them, he / she can respect their differences and forgive their crimes. Plato said, “knowledge that he spoke with the virtues of the same; in other words, it is a way of existence. How to deal with people who see things this knowledge not only different, but in his point of view, in his own change. In the new sense of everything, they get him for his lead to a new emotional response. It is in these responses, his life changed consistency. In this life he is born again.

Most of us are certain that we have free will, though what exactly this amount is much less certain. The question of the nature of free will is “the most contentious question of metaphysics.” If this is correct, then figuring out what free will is will be not a small task. Minimally, saying that an agent has free will is to analyze the agent which has the capacity to choose his or her course of action. But animals seem to satisfy this criterion, and we typically think that only human have free will which animals has not other around. Then understand free will means as the capacity unique to persons that allows them to control their actions. It is controversial whether this minimal understanding of what it actually means to have a free will requires an agent to have a specific faculty of will, whether the term “free will” is simply shorthand for other features of persons, and whether there really is such a thing as free will at all.”(Dolman, Ilham. Free Will: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction, p36)

However, people may still think that this is important not to make the difference between these two related but different concepts of free will as a freedom: the freedom of will and freedom of movement. This distinction is motivated by the obvious fact; agents can have freedom of movement, without a free will. For example, in the choice of people walk the dog, someone was taking a nap. As she slept, there was a snowstorm moved through the region. Wind drift on the front of her house, etc. It is people who can not get to her door, her dog away, even if she would like the snow. So here we have a case of free will, because she chose to walk the dog, but does not involve freedom of action, because she can not accept her dog for a walk.

To sum up, we can live effective and worthwhile lives without the presupposition of free will. soft determinism more compatible with living an effective life than hard determinism.