Education Tech

Week 9 Assignment 3 Submission 
 
The final project includes submissions from your prior assignments. The previous submissions must be revised based on instructor feedback and recommendations. Review the paper for flow and continuity. Note: The cover, abstract and reference pages do not count toward the final page number. The total page count should be fifteen to twenty (15-20) pages.
Compile the previous assignments and:

Create a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for your final project. 
Revise your project analysis. 
Revise your instructional and delivery strategies. 

Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

Create an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the three (3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1. Specify the measures that best fit each objective.  
Prepare a five (5) question test that correlates with the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Design the test so that each question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy. 
Determine the type of evaluation approach that is most appropriate for your project. Provide a rationale for your selection. 
Select a learning theory that applies to the instructional design of the project. Provide a rationale for your selection. 
Create three (3) learning theory principles, not previously mentioned, and specify how they apply to your project. 
Examine the information gaps within the project. Determine the information that is necessary in order to complete the project more effectively. Provide a rationale for your response. 
Specify the next steps to complete the delivery of the instruction. Identify final preparations needed such as the location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.  

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. 
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.   

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Analyze theories and models of instructional design in relation to learner and program needs. 
Assess instructional and training products. 
Write clearly and concisely about issues in instructional design and development using proper writing mechanics.  

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
   
Points: 260

Assignment 3: Final Project
 
Criteria

Unacceptable
Below 70% F

Fair
70-79% C

Proficient
80-89% B

Exemplary
90-100% A
 
Compile the previous assignments and:
 
1. Create a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for your final project.
Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely created a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for your final project.

Partially created a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for your final project.

Satisfactorily created a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for your final project.

Thoroughly created a quarter-page (1/4) informative abstract for your final project.
 
2. Revise your project analysis.
Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely revised your project analysis.

Partially revised your project analysis.

Satisfactorily revised your project analysis.

Thoroughly revised your project analysis.
 
3. Revise your instructional and delivery strategies.
Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely revised your instructional and delivery strategies.

Partially revised your instructional and delivery strategies.

Satisfactorily revised your instructional and delivery strategies.

Thoroughly revised your instructional and delivery strategies.
 
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
 
4. Create an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the three (3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1. Specify the measures that best fit each objective.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the three (3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1. Did not submit or incompletely specified the measures that best fit each objective.

Partially created an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the three (3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1. Partially specified the measures that best fit each objective.

Satisfactorily created an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the three (3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1. Satisfactorily specified the measures that best fit each objective.

Thoroughly created an evaluation plan that clearly correlates to the three (3) learning objectives you developed in Assignment 1. Thoroughly specified the measures that best fit each objective.
 
5. Prepare a five (5) question test that correlates with the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Design the test so that each question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely prepared a five (5) question test that correlates with the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Did not submit or incompletely designed the test so that each question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Partially prepared a five (5) question test that correlates with the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Partially designed the test so that each question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Satisfactorily prepared a five (5) question test that correlates with the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Satisfactorily designed the test so that each question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Thoroughly prepared a five (5) question test that correlates with the learning objectives from Assignment 1. Thoroughly designed the test so that each question is from a different level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
 
6. Determine the type of evaluation approach that is most appropriate for your project. Provide a rationale for your selection.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the type of evaluation approach that is most appropriate for your project. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your selection.

Partially determined the type of evaluation approach that is most appropriate for your project.  Partially provided a rationale for your selection.

Satisfactorily determined the type of evaluation approach that is most appropriate for your project. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your selection.

Thoroughly determined the type of evaluation approach that is most appropriate for your project. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your selection.
 
7. Select a learning theory that applies to the instructional design of the project. Provide a rationale for your selection.
Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely selected a learning theory that applies to the instructional design of the project. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your selection.

Partially selected a learning theory that applies to the instructional design of the project. Partially provided a rationale for your selection.

Satisfactorily selected a learning theory that applies to the instructional design of the project.  Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your selection.

Thoroughly selected a learning theory that applies to the instructional design of the project. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your selection.
 
8. Create three (3) learning theory principles, not previously mentioned, and specify how they apply to your project.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created three (3) learning theory principles, not previously mentioned, and did not submit or incompletely specified how they apply to your project.

Partially created three (3) learning theory principles, not previously mentioned, and partially specified how they apply to your project.

Satisfactorily created three (3) learning theory principles, not previously mentioned, and satisfactorily specified how they apply to your project.

Thoroughly created three (3) learning theory principles, not previously mentioned, and thoroughly specified how they apply to your project.
 
9. Examine the information gaps within the project. Determine the information that is necessary in order to complete the project more effectively. Provide a rationale for your response.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the information gaps within the project. Did not submit or incompletely determined the information that is necessary in order to complete the project more effectively. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially examined the information gaps within the project. Partially information that is necessary in order to complete the project more effectively. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily examined the information gaps within the project. Satisfactorily information that is necessary in order to complete the project more effectively. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly examined the information gaps within the project. Thoroughly information that is necessary in order to complete the project more effectively. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.
 
10. Specify the next steps to complete the delivery of the instruction. Identify final preparations needed such as the location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely specified the next steps to complete the delivery of the instruction. Did not submit or incompletely identified final preparations needed such as the location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.

Partially specified the next steps to complete the delivery of the instruction. Partially identified final preparations needed such as the location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.

Satisfactorily specified the next steps to complete the delivery of the instruction. Satisfactorily identified final preparations needed such as the location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.

Thoroughly specified the next steps to complete the delivery of the instruction. Thoroughly identified final preparations needed such as the location, resources, equipment, transportation and food.
 
11. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error-free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
 
12. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section
Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
 
13. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.

Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques or quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
 
14. Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.