Abstracts
The bacterial contaminants and heavy metal accumulating potentials of fin-fishes (Synodontis obesus and Marcusenius senegalensis) from the humic ecosystem of Eniong River, Akwa Ibom State were investigated. The results obtained revealed that the bacterial loads varied with the type of fin-fish and were much higher in fish intestines, when compared with the skin and gills. The heterotrophic bacterial loads obtained exceeded the 1.2 x 105cfu/g limit recommended for fresh fishes. High and unsafe fecal coliform (1.1 ± 0.1 x 103cfu/g -2.0 +0.39x 103cfu/g) loads were also obtained. Heavy metal analysis also revealed the presence of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Pb in the humic sediment. Concentrations of Cd (4.71 ± 0.34 to 4.91± 0.39 mg/kg), Cr (18.06 ± 5.78 to 20.22 ± 1.11 mg/kg), Cu (35.33 ± 3.25 to 40.28 ± 2.44 mg/kg), Ni (2.16 ± 0.07 to 2.26 ± 0.18 mg/kg) and Pb (175.85 ± 7.75 to 191. 08 ± 20.11 mg/kg) were found in the order Pb>Cu>Cr>Cd>Ni. Sequential extraction method (SEM) of analysis revealed the poor bioavailability status of heavy metals in sediment. It also showed that the percentage of bio-available and non-bio-available fractions of metals in sediment varied with the type of metals. Cu with 62.04% availability rate was the most bio-available element, as against Pb with 25.22 % availability rate. These correspond to their 32.4 % and 65.2 % residual potency rates. The calculated Biota to Sediment Accumulating Factor values for heavy metals in the fin-fishes revealed varied levels of accumulation in fishes. Cu (3.73±1.39mg/kg) in Synodontis obesus was the most accumulated. However, analysis of the bio-accumulation factors (BCF values) revealed generally low accumulation determined by fish type as well as the metal fractions and bio-available status. The results indicate the poor microbiological quality and poor potential of the fin-fishes as sentinel organism for metals contamination monitoring. These call for proper processing of aquatic foods as well as routine monitoring (but with alternative sentinels) to arrest the growing influence of anthropogenic activities on the level of heavy metals in Eniong River.
Keywords: Heavy metals, Freshwater, Fin-fishes, Bacterial Contaminants and Humic
In recent years contamination of aquatic environment by metals has risen as a result of increased industrial activities and attendant population surge especially around littoral zones which directly influences the quality of domestic wastes laden with heavy metals. Despite the natural sources of heavy metals in the environment, anthropogenic supply to aquatic ecosystems from industrial effluents/wastes, agricultural and domestic waste waters laden with metal toxicants outweighs the former. Heavy metal pollution is an important environmental problem (Benson et al., 2006), considering that some are hazardous substances and can bioaccumulate in the environment, plant and animal tissues (Zweig et al., 1999).
Heavy metals enter aquatic environment from natural and human activities (Amisah et al., 2009). Due to industrialization, the number of factories and pollution has increased rapidly. The contamination of water bodies with a wide range of pollutants has become a matter of concern over the last few years (Javed and Usmani, 2011). The natural aquatic ecosystems have extensively been contaminated with heavy metals released from domestic, industrial and other man-made activities (Velez and Montoro, 1998). Sediments are an important sink for trace metals especially in river mouth ecosystems. In some cases, sediments may contain 99% of the total amount of trace metalsexisting in aquatic systems(Renfro, 1973). It is known that metals accumulate on sediment surface, in benthic living things, planktonic organisms and other living matter and is enhanced through food chain. Fish accumulate xenobiotic compounds, especially those with high water solubility because of the very intimate contact with the medium that carries the compounds in solution, suspension and also because fish have to extract oxygen from the medium by passing the enormous volumes of water over gills. For fish, skin and digestive tract are potential sites of absorption of water soluble chemicals. The chemical once absorbed is transported by the blood to either a storage point, such as bone or to the liver for transportation. If transported by the liver it may be stored there, excreted in bile or passed back into the blood for possible excretion by kidney or gills or stored in extra hepatic tissues such as fat (Javed and Usmani, 2011).
Among the many pollutants, heavy metals show environmental persistence, toxicity at low concentration and ability to incorporate into food chain of aquatic organisms (Marichamy et al., 2011). Due to the deleterious effect of metals on aquatic ecosystem, it is necessary to monitor their accumulation in fishes. The higher the metal concentrations in the environment the more it may be taken up and accumulated by fish (Jezierska and Witeska, 2006). They emphasized that tissue metal level is related to its waterborne concentration only if metal is taken up by the fish from water. The trophic transfer of trace metals from water to aquatic animals of high trophic levels has been reported (Nguyen et al., 2014). Ikemoto et al. (2008) reported that significant trophic levels dependence was found in concentrations of Se, Rb and Hg at Hau River in Vietnam. The same researchers also revealed that the bio-magnification profiles of trace metals (Mn, Cu, Zn, Sr, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, Cs, Ba, T1 and Pb) were significantly higher in crustaceans, whereas fishes showed higher concentrations of Cr, Pb and Hg). Their findings showed variations in the metal accumulating potentials of diverse fish forms and species in aquatic systems.
Additionally, there are many distinct habitats in the freshwater ecosystem and each is characterized with its communities of microorganisms. For example, the humic freshwater sediment comprises larger amounts of organic deposits in the seafloor, and the source of these humic components or materials may be from the accumulation of dead plants and animals of the lake or stream, which on decomposition settles at the bottom of the water, thereby forming the river-bed sediment (Aiken et al., 1996). This river-bed sediment provides a nutrient-rich dwelling ecosystem for bottom animals, as well as other microorganisms. Recent reports by researchers indicate that the freshwater bottom sediment is highly characterized with various bacterial species which may include those of the genera: Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Azotobacter, Micrococcus, Enterococcus, Acromobacterium, Salmonella, Shigella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Flavobacterium and Escherichia species. While the fungal species commonly isolated include those of the genera, Penicillium, Aspergillus, Candida, Fusarium, Geotricum, and Saccharomyces species respectively (Del-Giorgio and Cole, 2000). These microorganisms play important roles during the mineralization of complex organic and other toxic chemical pollutants present in the freshwater sediment.
Heavy metals impact both the physiology and ecology of microorganisms (Sandrin and Maier, 2003) and are known to inhibit a broad range of microbial processes including methane metabolism, growth, nitrogen and sulphur concentration. Metals generate many of their deleterious effects through the formation of free radicals, resulting in DNA damage, lipid per oxidation and depletion of protein sulphydryl (Valko et al., 2005). In response to toxic concentrations of heavy metals, many organism including microorganisms can develop tolerance (Klerks and Weiss, 1987), resulting in the detoxification of such heavy metals. The development of heavy metal tolerance by microorganisms presents the possibility of utilizing and optimizing microbial mediated reactions as a strategy for removing metal contaminants from the environment. In addition, environmental components may have considerable influence on toxicity and therefore apparent toxicity.
On the other hand, bacteria are known to be ubiquitous in nature and they inhabit most of our food products including fin-fishes. Vibrios of sea-food origin have attracted increasing attention from time to time as it is found to be one of the important causes of food poisoning in man. The majority of outbreaks have also been epidemiologically traced to the consumption of fishes and shellfishes originating from warm coastal waters (Quintoil et al., 2007). Human infections caused by pathogens transmitted from fish or the aquatic environment are quite common depending on the season, patients’ contact with fish and related environment, dietary habits and the immune system status of the exposed individual. They are often bacterial species that are facultative pathogens of both fish and man and may be isolated from fish without apparent symptoms of disease. The infection source may be fish kept either for food or as a hobby (Novotny et al., 2004).
Studies have also been conducted on the heavy metal concentrations in fishes from rivers in Nigeria. The presence of unacceptable levels of Hg and Pb in the tissues of the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus from River Niger has been reported (Lawani and Alawode, 1996). Omoregie et al.
(2002) also reported enhanced levels of Pb, Cu and Zn in Oreochromis nilotica (Nile Tilapia) from
110 River Delimi. However, literatures on elemental burdens in fishes from humic freshwater ecosystem 111 are not available and little or no work has been done on the bioaccumulation of pathogenic bacterial 112 loads and heavy metals in fin-fishes from a humic ecosystem. This is despite the incessant cases of
113 crude oil pollution in the Niger Delta of Nigeria. Therefore this study is focused on bacterial 114 contaminants and heavy metal accumulating potentials of fin-fishes (Synodontis obesus and
115 Marcusenius senegalensis) from humic freshwater
116
119 The study area is a humic ecosystem of Eniong River, a tributary of the middle course of the 120 Cross River located in South-Eastern coast of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria (Figure 1). The
126
Figure 1: Location of the humic freshwater Eniong River in Itu Local Government Area where the fishes were harvested
128 Twenty samples of four different fish species (Synodontis obesus, Clarias gariepinus, 129 Coptodon guineensis and Marcusenius senegalensis) were collected during harvest from fishers from
130 Eniong River. The samples were carefully sorted out, separately contained in sterile polythene bags 131 sealed, labeled and preserved in an ice packed boxes. The samples were immediately within (2-3 132 hours of sampling) transported to the laboratory for analysis. Representative samples of the fin-fish 133 stocks collected were also taken to the Department of Fisheries, University of Uyo for identification. 134 Also collected were sediment sample with the aid of a metal grab sampler, samples were collected 135 from five different locations, and was stored in clean glass bottles, preserved in iced packed coolers 136 and transported to the laboratory for analysis.
143
144
149
150 151
156
159 This procedure was carried out to enhance the enumeration of the bacterial load of the 160 samples. Tenfold serial dilution of 1.0g of gills, tissue and intestine of each representative fish sample 161 was carried out as described by Cheesbrough (2006). Here, 1.0g of each sample was added to 9ml 162 sterile water then sequentially diluted to obtain the required dilution.
163
165 The media used for the study were: Nutrient Agar (NA), MacConkey Agar (MCA), Eosine 166 Methylene Blue Agar (EMBA) and Salmonella–Shigella agar (SSA) for the enumeration and isolation 167 of heterotrophic bacteria, total coliform, feacal coliform (Escherichia coli) and Salmonella and 168 Shigella species respectively. They were aseptically prepared according to the manufacturer’s 169 instructions, sterilized by autoclaving at 121OC for 15 minutes.
170
172 The density of heterotrophic and potential pathogens was determined using standard 173 analytical procedures. Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli (fecal coliform) and Salmonella and 174 Shigella loads on the samples was determined using the pour plate technique. All inoculated plates 175 were incubated at 37oC for 24 hours.
176 After 24 hours, discrete colonies that appeared on the culture plates were enumerated with the 177 aid of a Quebec colony counter and recorded as Colony Forming Units (CFU) per gram of fish 178 sample.
179
181 The pure bacterial isolates were grouped into recognizable taxonomic units and characterized to their 182 generic level using standard procedures. The pure isolates were examined for colonial morphology, 183 cultural and biochemical characteristics according to the methods of Cowan (1985) and Chessbrough, 184 (2006).
185
188 The analysis of heavy metals was carried out using the method of atomic absorption 189 spectroscopy (APHA, 1992). Only the fish muscles were used for this analysis. Atomic Absorption 190 Spectrometry (AAS) is a technique for measuring quantities of chemical elements present in 191 environmental samples by measuring the absorbed radiation by the chemical element of interest.
192 In this study, the samples (fish and sediment) were digested with ultra-pure nitric acid at 193 100oC until the solution becomes clear. Then the solution were made up to a known volume with 194 deionized distilled water and analyzed for heavy metals (Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Nickel and 195 Lead) using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS model GPC A932 ver. 1.1). The result 196 obtained was expressed as mg/kg wet weight.
197
199 Bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) are multipliers used to estimate concentrations of chemicals 200 that can accumulate in tissues through any route of exposure. It is referred to as bioconcentration
201 factor (BCF) for aquatic invertebrates. The BCF and biota to sediment accumulation factor (BSAF) of 202 heavy metals from sediment or surface water to animal tissues can be determined in different samples 203 using the following equations:
concentration of heavy metal in animal tissue
BCF = (1)
concentration of heavy metal in water sample
204
concentration of heavy metal in animal tissue
BSAF = (2)
concentration of heavy metal in sediment sample
205
213 For the purpose of classifying the biloavailable metallic status in each sample, five sequential 214 chemical extractions were performed with the objective of identifying the metal classifications
215 influenced by various environmental conditions: (a) exchangeable, (b) bound to carbonates, (c) bound
to iron and manganese oxides (reducible), (d) bound to organic matter (oxidizable), and (e) residual (Tessier et al., 1979). The selective extraction of fraction A was performed using 1.0 g of sieved sediment at room temperature for one hour with 8.0 mL of 1 M MgCl2 solution at pH 7.0 with continuous agitation. This fraction sometimes known as acid-soluble fraction provides information on the capacity of the sediment to absorb and desorp heavy metals in relation to changes in the ionic composition of the sediment. Sediment residues from fraction A will be leached at room temperature with 8.0 mL of 1 M sodium acetate at a pH of 5.0 (adjusted using acetic acid) with continuous agitation to obtain metals that are associated with carbonates (fraction B). For the reducible fraction (fraction C) extraction, sediment residues obtained from fraction B will be extracted with 20 mL of 0.04 M hydroxyl ammonium chloride in 25% (v/v) acetic acid for 6 hr at 96°C with occasional agitation of the solution. Fraction C constitutes heavy metals associated with iron and manganese oxides and is sensitive to redox potential variations.
The data was analyzed using the statistical software Pearson’s Correlation Analysis and Factors analysis. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed to explore the interrelationship among heavy metals in sediment and fish samples and identify their probable origin. The analysis was performed with a 95% confidence interval.
The results presented in Tables 1 – 2 showed that the ability of the fin-fishes to accumulate bacterial contaminants varied between the genera of fish analyzed as well as in the fish organs as the fish intestine generally accumulated more bacterial contaminants.
The bacterial loads of Synodontis obesus had the least level of skin contamination with densities of heterotrophic bacteria (1.5±0.87 x105 – 3.5 ±0.3×105CFU/g of skin scrapings), fecal coliform (0 – 2.3 ±0.87×103CFU/g of skin scrapings) and coliform (2.0 ±0.17×103 to 7.7 ±0.69×104CFU/g of skin scrapings). The salmonella shigella count recorded ranged from 0 to 1.9 ±0.17 x103CFU/g of skin scrapings). On the other hand, the bacterial loads of Marcusenius senegalensis skin samples were 2.2±0.92 x 105– 3.3 ± 0.25×105, 0 and 2.0 +0.39 x 103, 1.0 +0.34 x 103 and 2.5 ± 0.26x 103 and 0 to 1.9 ± 0.1 x 102CFU/g of skin scrapings for heterotrophic bacteria, fecal coliform, coliform and salmonellae shigella respectively.
Table 1: Bacteriological loads of Synodontis obesus skin samples
Sample (Skin) | THBC |
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more